On the occasion of Children's Day a group of feminist organisations who had sent out a letter earlier to the Delhi CM Kejriwal on this matter, sent a joint letter...
Senior advocate Indira Jaising has apprised the Supreme Court of a wrongly recorded fact in one of its recent orders, which stated that she agreed to transfer of the Petitions in Judge Loya case from the Bombay High Court to the Apex Court.
On Monday (22nd January), a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, and comprising of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice AM Khanwilkar heard the petitions seeking a an independent investigation into the death of CBI Judge BH, who was hearing the alleged fake encounter case of Sohrabuddin Sheikh at the time of his death. The petitions were filed by Maharashtra-based journalist Banduraj Sambhaji Lone and Congress leader Tehseen Poonawalla.
The bench had, in its order dated 22 January, noted,
“We have been apprised that two Public Interest Litigations have been filed in the Bombay High Court, one at the Principal Seat at Bombay High Court forming the subject matter of P.I.L. No.2 of 2018 and another at the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court i.e. Writ Petition No.1130 of 2017. We think it in the fitness of things appropriate to transfer the said writ petitions to this Court and, accordingly, it is so ordered. Mr. Dave and Ms. Jaising have fairly agreed to this course of action.”
It is this observation that Ms. Jaising has now rebutted and has approached the Court for its removal. Ms Jaising has clarified that she is not appearing for either of the petitioners in the case, senior advocate Dushyant Dave is appearing on behalf of Bombay Lawyers Association. She has stated that it follows from this that she could not have agreed to the transfer.
On 23rd January, she mentioned before the Court of the Chief Justice that this error should be corrected and pointed out the page to her request to intervene is recorded. She noted that the judges kindly agreed to her request. Ms Jaising has apprised the court that she will be filing an intervention on behalf of Admiral Ramdas.
The Court on Monday directed that similar Writ Petitions pending before the Bombay High Court be transferred to it and barred all High Courts from entertaining any similar petitions.
The suspicious circumstances surrounding the death of Judge Loya was brought into the limelight following news reports done by the Caravan published on 20th and 21st November, 2017. They raised several questions raised by the family with regard to the death of the 48-year-old CBI Judge in Mumbai, Brijgopal Harkishan Loya, the judge who was hearing the alleged encounter killing of Sohrabuddin Sheikh in 2005.
The reports have understandably created a furore in the legal fraternity. The matter has previously been assigned to Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar. In the press conference on 12th January, which was called by the four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court after the Chief Justice, the media asked the judges if their concerns were connected to the Judge Loya case to which Justices Chelameswar and Gogoi responded in the affirmative. There have been allegations against the CJI of allotting matters to benches arbitrarily and ignoring the seniority of judges when constituting benches of grave importance. Following this controversy, the Judge Loya petition was transferred back to the CJI court.
While the circumstances surrounding the death of the judge have raised certain questions, there are also legal questions that have been raised and must be addressed. For one, in the order passed in the case of CBI v Amitbhai Anil Chandra Shah it was held:
“The Administrative Committee would assign the case to a court where the trial may be concluded judiciously, in accordance with law, and without any delay. The Administrative Committee would also ensure that the trial should be conducted from beginning to end by the same officer.”
However these directions by the Supreme Court were clearly flouted as the first judge hearing the case JT Utpat was transferred from the CBI special court in June 2014, and replaced by Loya.
The next date for the hearing is 2nd February.
Padmavati issue: "Let people who don’t like the movie not watch it. We are not going to modify our order”, says CJI to states
GST on sanitary napkins: SC stays proceedings in Delhi and Bombay HCs
Constitution Bench hearing on Aadhaar begins- Shyam Divan: “Our Constitution repudiates Aadhaar to preserve itself, its binding values, and to preserve the advent of all intrusive State where it is not about citizens but numbers”
Death of Judge Loya: SC bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra orders transfer of petitions from Bombay HC
Hadiya: Marital status not a matter of investigation says SC
Bombay HC to hear arguments in PIL challenging CBI court order discharging Amit Shah in Sohrabuddin fake encounter case
Gobble D. Gook has noticed that of late, our Apex Court has become very fond of transferring cases from various High Courts to itself..like snatching a half-eaten candy from a child saying it will...
The hearing of the case that everyone was waiting for has commenced with a lot of fireworks in the SC.. Not as anyone's morale booster, But just "as per the roster"(Lol) Heavyweights Salve &...
“Justice Loya’s death, accident or murder?” Lawyers demand monitored and fair inquiry in front of the Supreme Court
Today on 22nd January, approximately 300 lawyers gathered around the Supreme Court of India in a silent protest, demanding a fair and just inquiry into the death of Chief Justice Loya. The Peaceful Silent Protest...
Aadhar Day 2- Senior Advocate Shyam Divan: “How can the State compel me to part with personal information to a private entity?”
The 5 judge Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court continued the hearing in the petitions challenging the Aadhaar Project. Senior Advocate Shyam Divan continued with his arguments. He started with reiterating on how the verification of...
In a first of its kind petition, Senior Advocate Ms. Indira Jaising today filed a petition in the Supreme Court calling for the live streaming and/or video recording of Supreme Court cases of ‘national...
By Arvind Kurian Abraham The political tussle between the Arvind Kejriwal led Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCT) and the Lt. Governor and the Central...
Constitution Bench of SC overturns two-judge bench order in matter of corruption including Apex Court judges
A series of events that played out last week in the Supreme Court resulted in the crescendo hearing on Friday whereby a petition was heard before a five-judge bench...
Photo Credit: R.Prasad The drama reported from the 1st Court Constitution Bench and the resultant walkout by one of the Petitioner's activist advocate made Gobble D. Gook very...
The Memorandum of Procedure (MoP)controversy has confirmed one important fact to Gobble D. Gook. That there is a 'Supreme Bench' within the Supreme Court! ..And it is that Bench...
News Update- GNCTD v. Union of India- CJI: “There cannot be difference of opinion in day-to-day matters”
On day 2 of GNCTD v. Union of India, Senior Advocate, Gopal Subramaniam continued his arguments and focused on interpretation of aid and advise of the Council of Ministers in the...
By Radhika Saxena On 13th September 2017, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana suspended the sentences awarded and granted bail to the accused in the Jindal Rape Case, as...
By Tushar Gandhi The real reason to reopen the case could be the desire to whitewash the findings of the Kapur Commission that had implicated Hindutva ideologue Veer Savarkar and...
News Update: SC reserves judgement on question if Courts can rely upon Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports
A Constitution Bench comprising of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justices A.K. Sikri, A. M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan has reserved its judgment in the case where...
News Update: Jallikattu petition- Supreme Court issues notice to TN Government, gives four weeks to respond
On Monday (November 6th) a Bench comprising of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Khanwilkar heard a petition filed by the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (...